Two recent studies examine the diagnostic utility of pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy:
- PS Kawada et al. JPGN 2017; 64: 898-902
- M Thomson, S Sharma. JPGN 2017; 64: 903-06
Before looking at these studies more closely, I would say that I was struck by contrasting remarks in their discussions. The first study: “a negative colonoscopy has not been shown to improve outcomes in those with functional pain” and references: Bonilla S et a. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 2011; 50: 396-401. The second study states that “a negative endoscopic finding, with effective reassurance, can prevent unnecessary medicalization of many children in whom other nonorganic causes may present with GI symptoms.” The latter study does not provide any data to support their claim.
In terms of the specifics, the first study is a retrospective examination of 999 colonoscopies. The indications for colonoscopy were suspected IBD; in this circumstance, 143 of 449 (32%) were normal. For isolated rectal bleeding, 141 of 197 (72%) were normal. For recurrent abdominal pain, all 46 were normal. The cecal or beyond completion rate was only 52%, potentially lowering diagnostic yield. The perforation rate during the 10 year timeframe (2001-2010) was 0.2%. The authors conclude that the yield of colonoscopy for recurrent abdominal pain (without other features) is very low and that many children with isolated rectal bleeding “should have a trial of conservative management before undergoing endoscopy.”
The second study retrospectively examined 153 endoscopic cases from a database of 2471 children (2012-2014). The median age was 9.58 years. The authors found a diagnostic yield of 18.9% for upper endoscopy alone, 32.6% for ileocolonoscopy alone, and 39.2% for combined upper endoscopy/ileocolonoscopy. The terminal ileum intubation rate was 98%.
My take: Both of these studies look at pediatric endoscopy and reach opposite conclusions. The first study suggests that many colonoscopies could be avoided and the latter suggests that whether normal or not, endoscopy contributes to improved management. What is your conclusion?
Related blog posts:
- Adverse Events Following Pediatric Endoscopy –Underestimated Previously
- Disaccharidase Deficiencies in Recurrent Abdominal Pain …
- Does negative testing reassure patients? | gutsandgrowth
- 10 Years of Anxiety and Endoscopy Correlation