A recent NY Times article highlights the end of a renowned food-scientist Brian Wansink’s career at Cornell which “came to an unceremonious end. On Sept. 20. The university announced that a yearlong investigation had found that he committed “academic misconduct in his research and scholarship, including misreporting of research data,” and that he had tendered his resignation.” This commentary highlights other problems with nutrition studies: More Evidence That Nutrition Studies Don’t Always Add Up
My take: Nutrition studies are difficult –having academic misconduct is going to further undermine the credibility of these studies.
A recent study (M Geserick et al. NEJM 2018; 379: 1303-12) performed a prospective and retrospective analysis of a population-based sample of 51,505 German children to examine BMI in early childhood and risk of sustained obesity.
- Most normal weight adolescents had a normal weight throughout childhood
- Half (53%) of the obese adolescents had been overweight or obese from 5 years of age onward
- Almost 90% of children who were obese at 3 years of age were overweight or obese in adolescence
- Among obese adolescents, the most rapid weight gain had occurred between 2 and 6 years of age
My take: We are losing the childhood obesity battle at very young ages.
Abstract and Link to 1:32 Quick Summary: Acceleration of BMI in Early Childhood
Briefly noted: B Singh et al. J Pediatr 2018; 200: 79-83. In this study of 87 infants witth birth weights 1500-2000, avoiding routine assessment of gastric residual volumes before feeding advancement did not shorten the time to reach full feeds. However, checking these residuals provided no clear advantages and have some potential disadvantages:
- Time-consuming to check and may inaccurate depending on size/location of orogastric/nasogastric tube
- Discarding gastric contents results in loss of gastric enzymes and acid
The authors note that prior studies have shown that gastric residuals are “unreliable predictors of feeding intolerance” studies have had discrepancies with regard to whether they are predictive of necrotizing enterocolitis.
Related blog post: When to Check Gastric Residuals in Preterm Infants
A recent study (K Wong et al. J Pediatr 2018; 200: 188-95) examined a longitudinal cohort of 323 females in the Australian Rett Syndrome Study.
- 30.3% of the cohort underwent gastrostomy placement
- BMI was greater in individuals with gastrostomy placement
- Median age of gastrostomy placement was 9 years
- The all-cause mortality rate was greater in those who had gastrostomy placement compared with those who had not (hazard ratio 4.07, CI 1.96-8.45)
- Survival: 66.1% of the entire cohort was alive at 20 years of age (median survival was 33 years). The survival was 87.3% in those without a gastrostomy.
- Placement of a gastrostomy tube was not associated with fewer hospitalizations or improvement in parental physical or mental health
While the mortality was higher in those who received a gastrostomy tube, the study’s nonrandomized design does not allow definitive assessment of whether a gastrostomy tube is detrimental to long-term survival. Children who received gastrostomy tube may have had additional comorbidities.
My take: In adult medicine, it is generally accepted that Gtube placement does not prolong life (Clin Gastro & Hep 2007; 5: 1372). This study indicates that a Gtube may not improve longevity in many pediatric disorders as well.
Related blog posts:
A recent study (Y Xu. Clinical Nutrition 2018; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.022) showed that exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is less effective in patient’s with Crohn’s disease with isolated colonic disease.
Abstract Link: Isolated Colonic Crohn’s Disease is Associated with a Reduced Response to Exclusive Enteral Nutrition Compared to Ileal or Ileocolonic Disease
This was a retrospective study of 241 adults: 52 patients in the cCD (isolated colonic disease) group and 189 patients in the non-cCD group.
- “The rates of clinical remission differed between the two groups (cCD group: 51.9% versus non-cCD group: 68.3%, P = 0.029). Multivariate analyses indicated that isolated colonic involvement was associated with a reduced response to EEN (OR = 2.74; [CI] 95% = [1.2 –6.23], P = 0.016).”
- “Further analysis showed that even in patients who achieved clinical remission after EEN, inflammatory serum markers declined more slowly in the cCD group than in the non-cCD group, and the time to remission was longer in the cCD group.”
Related blog posts:
A recent study (J Ma et al. Gastroenterol 2018; 155: 107-17) shows that a “better diet” was associated with less liver fat.
Among the 1521 participants form a Framingham Heart Study cohort (Mean age 51 years at start of study), the authors assessed diet with a 125-item Harvard food frequency questionnaire and liver fat using liver-phantom ratio (LPR) on CT images between 2002-2005 and then again 2008-2011. They specifically looked at 2 diet scores:
- Mediterranean-style diet score (MDS)
- Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI)
- For each 1 standard deviation increase in MDS, the LPR increased (less liver fat) by 0.57 and the odds for incident fatty liver decreased by 26% (P=.002)
- Similarly, for each 1 standard deviation increase in AHEI, LPR increased by 0.56 and the odds for incident fatty liver decreased by 21% (P=.02)
My take: This study shows that Improved diet quality over 6 years was associated with reduced liver fat accumulation
Lake Louise, Banff